Skip to main content
Sign In
 

Abstract Review Criteria

Educational Scholarship & Innovation Symposium


Abstracts will be reviewed as either research or an educational innovation based on the following criteria. Thank you to COMSEP for the original scoring criteria.

Goals:
The basic purpose of the research/project is clear

Goals:
The objectives of the research/project address a problem of importance

Background/Preparation:
The author shows an understanding of existing literature

Background/Preparation:
The author links the existing literature to the research/project

Methods:
The methods chosen and applied are appropriate for the research/project

Methods:
The methods are clearly explained

Analysis / Evaluation:
The research analysis / project evaluation is appropriate for the respective research/project

Analysis / Evaluation:
The analysis/evaluation is clearly explained

Results:
There is evidence of significant research outcome / success of the project

Results:
The results contribute notably to the field

Conclusions:
Accurate interpretation of results

Conclusions:
Possible recommendations for education, practice or policy

Presentation:
The writing is clear

Presentation:
Each section is appropriately linked to other sections

​​