Andrew M. Thorburn
Professor and Vice Chair, Dept. of Pharmacology
University of Colorado Denver
Department of Pharmacology
Mail Stop 8303, RC1-South
12801 East 17th Ave
Aurora, CO 80045
Phone: (303) 724-3290
Lab: (303) 724-3371
Fax: (303) 724-3663
Current Lab Members:
Christina Menke Senior PRA
Jackie Thorburn Senior PRA
Lian Zhang Postdoctoral Fellow
Jacob Gump Postdoctoral Fellow
Paola Maycotte Postdoctoral Fellow
Jean Mulcahy-Levy Postdoctoral Fellow
Yalin Li PRA
Apoptosis Regulation in Cancer Development and Treatment
Our laboratory studies the regulation of apoptosis and other forms of cell death as it relates to two important issues in cancer biology¬– the development of cancer and the response of cancer cells to therapy. Many of the projects in our lab focus on understanding proteins that contain Death Domains (DD), which are protein interaction domains that are particularly important in the regulation of apoptosis by Death Receptors of the Tumor Necrosis Factor superfamily. Related projects address the following questions.
Which apoptosis signaling pathways must be disrupted to allow epithelial cancers to develop? Evasion of apoptosis is one of the hallmarks of cancer and defects in apoptosis regulation are thought to be necessary for cancer development. Thus, it is sometimes thought that cancer cells are generally resistant to apoptotic stimuli in comparison with their normal counterparts. However, this idea is incorrect; most cancer cells undergo apoptosis quite readily and are, in fact, often more sensitive than their normal counterparts to common apoptotic stimuli such as DNA damaging agents and other stresses. This raises the question of which, if any, specific apoptotic pathways must be disrupted to permit cancer development. We tackled this problem by searching for signaling proteins that induce apoptosis in primary cultures of normal human epithelial cells (from prostate or breast) but cannot induce apoptosis in cancer cells. The molecule that we found is the DD from an adaptor protein called FADD, which is an essential component of death receptor signaling pathways. The isolated FADD-DD can induce apoptosis in normal but not cancerous epithelial cells and does not kill normal fibroblasts or other cell types. As far as we are aware, this is the first example of an apoptosis pathway that is epithelial-specific, functional in normal primary cells and disabled in cancer cells. These characteristics are what we expect for a cell death pathway that functions to suppress cancer and is specifically disrupted during carcinoma development. The FADD-DD-dependent pathway in normal cells is mechanistically distinct from the established FADD pathway, which works in cancer cells after stimulation with Death Receptor agonists. The novel pathway involves both caspases and serine proteases that kill cells by different mechanisms involving both apoptosis and an alternate form of programmed cell death called autophagy. The pathway becomes defective at a very early stage in the transformation process (acquisition of an immortalized phenotype) and resistance to the pathway is not related to loss of p53 function activation of telomerase, inactivation of the Rb gene or loss of function of the INK4a/ARF locus. Therefore, we have identified a novel p53-independent, epithelial-specific, cell death pathway that becomes defective upon epithelial cell immortalization and is perhaps the earliest cell death defect during breast or prostate cancer development. Current work is focused on identifying components of this signaling pathway, determining the role of death receptor agonists in its activation and determining why immortal cells are resistant to the pathway. We are also developing mouse models to test how this pathway is involved in tumor suppression in vivo.
How do Fas and TRAIL receptors work in normal and cancerous cells? We are studying the mechanism of death receptor activation by focusing on the recruitment of FADD to activated death receptors. Using modified two hybrid methods that allow us to identify point mutants that specifically disrupt some protein-protein interactions, we have shown that current models of how FADD is recruited to these receptors through Death Domains on both molecules are oversimplified and that regulation through other domains in the receptors and FADD is an important aspect of receptor regulation. In collaboration with Human Genome Sciences, which has developed therapeutic antibodies that activate TRAIL receptors and are in phase I trials for various human cancers, we are studying how these domains regulate receptor signaling pathways in normal and cancer cells. Current work focuses on understanding the mechanisms through which the other domains control DD interactions, determining the role of the receptors in activating the novel FADD-DD pathway in normal cells and identifying and understanding tumor-derived mutations in receptors and FADD that affect these signaling mechanisms.
How and why does the adaptor protein TRADD induce apoptotic signals from different cellular compartments? Another DD-containing adaptor protein, TRADD, is an essential component of the TNFR1 signaling pathway. Our work on TRADD focuses on understanding how TRADD signaling is regulated in different sub-cellular compartments. We made the surprising discovery that TRADD, a protein that had been expected to work at the cell surface TNFR1 receptor, is rapidly shuttled between the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Furthermore, when in the nucleus, TRADD associates with PML nuclear bodies and can induce apoptosis through a mechanism that is different from its mode of action in the cytoplasm. This is therefore an unusual example where the same protein activates different cell death pathways depending upon its location in the cell. The nuclear apoptosis pathway that is activated by TRADD requires PML and involves p53 suggesting that this pathway is involved in nuclear stress responses. Current work focuses on understanding the mechanism of action of the nuclear TRADD pathway, and we have shown that this occurs via activation of the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway leading to activation of caspase-9. We are also determining how and why TRADD nuclear shuttling is regulated and determining the physiological role of this pathway.
How do tumor cell-targeted toxins induce apoptosis? In a translational research project in collaboration with Dr. Art Frankel, we are studying the mechanism of action of tumor-cell targeted toxins that are being developed to treat glioblastoma and various leukemias. These molecules contain a targeting domain (usually a growth factor or antibody) fused to a bacterial or plant toxin (in our case diphtheria toxin). Upon receptor-mediated uptake into tumor cells, the toxin induces apoptosis. We are studying how this occurs with a particular focus on the mechanism of action of an EGF-targeted diphtheria toxin that we are developing as a treatment for glioblastoma. In some cells FADD-dependent signaling pathways are important for toxin-induced cell killing and caspase-dependent apoptosis occurs. However in glioblastoma cells, one of our toxins is an effective cell killer but does so through a caspase-independent mechanism. Moreover, the targeted diphtheria toxin can selectively sensitize glioblastoma cells to TRAIL and agonistic antibodies that activate the TRAIL receptors. Thus, we have a system where we can alter both the extent and mechanism of glioblastoma cell killing by treating cells with the recombinant toxin on its own or in combination with TRAIL receptor agonists. Current work focuses on understanding how these toxins work, determining the mechanisms of caspase-independent cell killing and synergy with TRAIL. Future studies will focus on determining how these mechanisms impact on the clinical response to the drug.
Fig. 1. Transmission electron microscopy of tumor cell apoptosis. Prostate cancer cells treated with the potential anti-cancer agent TRAIL undergoing apoptotic cell death demonstrating cellular and nuclear condensation and fragmentation and membrane blebbing. Our lab focuses on understanding how TRAIL kills tumor cells, why some cells are resistant and determining how TRAIL co-operates with other anti-cancer treatments.
Fig. 2. Model of Death Receptor-induced apoptosis. Ligand binding to TRAIL or other death receptors leads to conformational changes in the intracellular domain of the receptors that cause recruitment of the adaptor protein FADD and caspase-8 leading to activation of caspase-8 proteolytic activity and apoptosis. Our studies focus on the mechanism of FADD recruitment to the receptor complex, which activates the apoptosis signaling pathway.
Fig. 3.- FADD-DD-induced apoptosis of normal prostate cells. Normal human prostate cells were injected with the death domain of the adaptor protein FADD (left panels) or control fluorescent protein (right panel). Time-lapse microscopy shows that FADD-DD kills the normal cells. This cell death occurs only in normal epithelial cells and is selectively inactivated at the earliest stages of cancer development. We are characterizing this pathway, which we think represents one of the earliest cell death defects in prostate and breast cancer development.
1. Horita H, Thorburn J, Frankel AE, Thorburn A. EGFR-targeted diphtheria toxin stimulates TRAIL killing of glioblastoma cells by depleting anti-apoptotic proteins.
J Neurooncol. 2009 Nov;95(2):175-84. Epub 2009 May 17.PMID: 19449148
2. Thorburn J, Frankel AE, Thorburn A. Regulation of HMGB1 release by autophagy.
Autophagy. 2009 Feb;5(2):247-9. Epub 2009 Feb 5.PMID: 19098461
3. Horita H, Frankel AE, Thorburn A. Acute myeloid leukemia-targeted toxin activates both apoptotic and necroptotic death mechanisms. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3909. Epub 2008 Dec 11.PMID: 19079542
4. Thorburn J, Horita H, Redzic J, Hansen K, Frankel AE, Thorburn A. Autophagy regulates selective HMGB1 release in tumor cells that are destined to die. Cell Death Differ. 2009 Jan;16(1):175-83. Epub 2008 Oct 10.PMID: 18846108
5. Thorburn A, Behbakht K, Ford H. TRAIL receptor-targeted therapeutics: resistance mechanisms and strategies to avoid them. Drug Resist Updat. 2008 Feb-Apr;11(1-2):17-24. Epub 2008 Apr 18. Review.PMID: 18374623
6. Thorburn A. Studying autophagy's relationship to cell death.
Autophagy. 2008 Apr 1;4(3):391-4. Epub 2008 Feb 1.PMID: 18253085
7. Thorburn A. Apoptosis and autophagy: regulatory connections between two supposedly different processes. Apoptosis. 2008 Jan;13(1):1-9. Review.PMID: 17990121
8. Bin L, Thorburn J, Thomas LR, Clark PE, Humphreys R, Thorburn A. Tumor-derived mutations in the TRAIL receptor DR5 inhibit TRAIL signaling through the DR4 receptor by competing for ligand binding. J Biol Chem. 2007 Sep 21;282(38):28189-94. Epub 2007 Jul 31.PMID: 17666396
9. Thorburn A. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) pathway signaling. J Thorac Oncol. 2007 Jun;2(6):461-5. Review.PMID: 17545839
10. Lyons TR, Thorburn J, Ryan PW, Thorburn A, Anderson SM, Kassenbrock CK. Regulation of the Pro-apoptotic scaffolding protein POSH by Akt.
J Biol Chem. 2007 Jul 27;282(30):21987-97. Epub 2007 May 29.PMID: 17535800
11. Behbakht K, Qamar L, Aldridge CS, Coletta RD, Davidson SA, Thorburn A, Ford HL. Six1 overexpression in ovarian carcinoma causes resistance to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis and is associated with poor survival. Cancer Res. 2007 Apr 1;67(7):3036-42.PMID: 17409410
12. Hippert MM, O'Toole PS, Thorburn A. Autophagy in cancer: good, bad, or both?
Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 1;66(19):9349-51. Review.PMID: 17018585
13. Thorburn A, Frankel AE. Apoptosis and anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006 Feb;5(2):197-9. No abstract available. PMID: 16505091